Limits and behaviour
1 MiB
Larger files are refused.
quota-enforced
Checked on both single-record creation and import, against your
organization’s quota.
60–604800 seconds, default 3600
Omit it, or send
0, to get the default of one hour. Any other value below
the 60-second minimum is refused — 0 is a sentinel meaning “use the
default”, not the bottom of the range, so 30 is an error where 0 is not.On update that sentinel does not apply: 0 is refused there, because a PATCH
that sends it is asking for a TTL of zero rather than declining to choose.The maximum is 604800 (7 days).202, runs in the background
Deletes every record it owns, plus the zone’s DNSSEC key material and the DS
at its parent — the zone row goes last, so nothing is ever left half-removed.The call answers
202, not 204: the teardown is accepted, not
finished, and the zone still exists when it returns. Poll
GET /v1/zones/{zone_id} until it 404s. That matters if you mean to
re-create the same name — until the teardown completes, creating it again
answers 409.Troubleshooting
The zone does not resolve at all
The zone does not resolve at all
Check
ownership.verified. A zone with no zone above it on the platform
does not answer until ownership is proved — creating it is not claiming
it. Set the zone’s own nameservers at your registrar and call
verify-ownership; see proving ownership.I set the nameservers but verify still fails
I set the nameservers but verify still fails
Two things do this.You used Basaltic’s bare nameserver names rather than the ones your
zone lists. Only the labelled names verify a zone — compare what is at your
registrar against the
nameservers array character for character.The domain is delegated to two Basaltic zones at once. While that is
true neither one is served, and the verify message says so. Remove the
nameservers your zone does not list. Expect this midway through moving a
domain between accounts.Re-creating a zone I just deleted returns 409
Re-creating a zone I just deleted returns 409
The delete is still running.
DELETE answers 202 and the teardown
finishes in the background, dropping the zone row last — so for a few
seconds the name is still taken. Poll GET /v1/zones/{zone_id} until it
404s, then create.A name resolves for some people and SERVFAILs for others
A name resolves for some people and SERVFAILs for others
That pattern — works for non-validating resolvers, fails for validating
ones — is the signature of a CNAME sharing a name with another record. The
API refuses new ones, but a zone imported or migrated in unusual ways is
worth checking. List the records at that name and make sure the CNAME is
alone.
DNSSEC validation fails everywhere
DNSSEC validation fails everywhere
Almost always a missing or stale DS record at the registrar. Compare what
the registrar publishes against
dnssec.ds_records on the zone — a DS
left over from a previous provider breaks validation exactly as
thoroughly as none at all.An import did not remove the records I deleted
An import did not remove the records I deleted
Working as intended — import merges and never deletes. An RRset absent
from the file is left alone. Delete records explicitly through the record
endpoints.